Our office previously reported a Washtenaw County dispute in which Farm Bureau sought to compel a no-fault claimant to undergo neuropsychological testing by psychologist Christian Schutte. The firm objected under MCL 500.3151, and Judge Archie Brown denied the motion as described in that report.

What the reported order addressed

The report states that the court treated psychologists as outside the physicians authorized by the no-fault examination statute. This is a report of a particular trial-court ruling and the firm’s litigation position, not a statement that every examination request in every kind of lawsuit is invalid.

MCL 500.3151 addresses examinations and physician qualifications. The legal basis for a request, the proceeding, the provider, and the governing authorities require review in the individual case.

Do not confuse statutory and other examination questions

A no-fault benefit examination, a treating-provider assessment, and an examination sought during litigation may raise different issues. An objection should identify the actual source of authority and requested scope rather than assume a general title decides the issue.

Do not simply miss an appointment based on an online case report. Obtain prompt advice about responding, any qualification objection, and potential consequences.

Documents to preserve

  • The complete examination notice, referral, stated purpose, date, and provider details.
  • Policy provisions or legal authority cited for the request.
  • Correspondence objecting to or explaining the request.
  • Relevant treatment records and any subsequent report or benefits decision.

Our examination preparation guide addresses the broader process. For a current benefit dispute, see our no-fault practice.

Talk with Logeman & Iafrate

Request a free consultation or call (734) 994-0200 to discuss your situation with our Ann Arbor office. Bring the relevant records and any insurer correspondence. Advice about your claim depends on the facts, coverage, and applicable deadlines.

General information only; this article is not legal advice for an individual case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a statewide decision invalidating every nonphysician assessment?

No. The article describes the firm’s reported trial-court ruling and its specific statutory dispute.

Should I skip an examination because of this report?

No. Obtain case-specific advice about the request and how to respond.

‍This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney at Logeman & Iafrate, P.C. for advice regarding your individual situation.