On January 20, 2023, a unanimous Washtenaw County jury found for Adrienne Logeman’s client in the attendant-care case previously reported by the firm. The case was tried before Judge Arianne Slay.
The firm’s reported result
The announcement states that State Farm refused to pay family-provided 24-hour attendant care based on an insurer examination. The jury found the care was required and the denial wrongful; the firm reported penalties and that State Farm had made no settlement offer before trial.
The original announcement did not state a dollar award, and no amount is added here. This case result does not establish that every family-care claim qualifies for 24-hour payment or the same remedies.
For a current care dispute
The medical need, actual care, records, policy and injury dates, applicable law, and reason for denial must be evaluated. Keep provider recommendations, accurate care logs, bills, the examination report, and the written coverage decision.
Read the attendant-care documentation guide and PIP denial remedies. Our no-fault practice page explains representation. Past results depend on their individual facts and do not guarantee future outcomes.
Talk with Logeman & Iafrate
Request a free consultation or call (734) 994-0200 to discuss your situation with our Ann Arbor office. Bring the relevant records and any insurer correspondence. Advice about your claim depends on the facts, coverage, and applicable deadlines.
General information only; this article is not legal advice for an individual case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this article add a dollar amount to the verdict?
No. It preserves the scope of the original announcement.
Does the result establish my family’s care entitlement?
No. Your need, documentation, coverage, and governing rules require individual review.
Awards and Honors
.svg)